Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;11(3):1383–1400. doi: 10.1364/BOE.381257

Table 4. Performance results from all optical imaging modalities for the salivary tumor cohort, separated by salivary gland group (average ± SEM). The best performing modality for each groups’ evaluation metrics is bolded.

Group Imaging AUC Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity
Parotid (N = 3) HSI 0.92 ± 0.04 88 ± 4% 90 ± 4% 79 ± 7%
Autofluorescence 0.60 ± 0.30 87 ± 2% 99 ± 1% 26 ± 26%
2-NBDG Dye 0.77 ± 0.12 87 ± 2% 97 ± 3% 31 ± 31%
Proflavin Dye 0.64 ± 0.32 89 ± 2% 96 ± 2% 54 ± 27%
Gaussian-RGB 0.66 ± 0.15 81 ± 5% 97 ± 2% 38 ± 24%
Human-Eye 0.72 ± 0.02 78 ± 15% 95 ± 5% 35 ± 20%

Other Salivary (N = 3) HSI 0.59 ± 0.14 76 ± 12% 55 ± 29% 85 ± 15%
Autofluorescence 0.80 ± 0.14 84 ± 10% 77 ± 13% 85 ± 6%
2-NBDG Dye 0.52 ± 0.08 76 ± 11% 49 ± 28% 84 ± 16%
Proflavin Dye 0.62 ± 0.10 77 ± 11% 60 ± 30% 78 ± 22%
Gaussian-RGB 0.45 ± 0.03 70 ± 10% 62 ± 31% 57 ± 43%
Human-Eye 0.78 ± 0.15 84 ± 9% 76 ± 12% 87 ± 6%