Comparison 1. Diaphragm‐triggered non‐invasive versus other non‐invasive respiratory support.
Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Failure of modality | 1 | 16 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.33 [0.02, 7.14] |
2 Gastrointestinal perforation | 1 | 16 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.0 [‐0.21, 0.21] |
3 Pulmonary air leak | 1 | 16 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.0 [‐0.21, 0.21] |
4 Maximum FiO2 | 1 | Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) | ‐4.29 [‐5.47, ‐3.11] | |
5 Maximum Edi signal | 2 | Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) | ‐1.75 [‐3.75, 0.26] | |
6 Respiratory rate | 2 | Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI) | 7.22 [0.21, 14.22] |