Table 5.
The extent of adoption of SCEPs: Generalized ordered logit results.
| Variables | Level 1 (0–1 practice) |
Level 2 (1–2 practices) |
Level 3 (2–3 practices) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef. | Coef. | Coef. | ||||
| Number of Plots | -0.41∗∗∗ | (0.09) | -0.41∗∗∗ | (0.09) | -0.41∗∗∗ | (0.09) |
| Plot Size (in acres) | 1.23∗∗∗ | (0.30) | 0.54∗∗∗ | (0.16) | 0.14 | (0.15) |
| Distance to Plot | -0.00 | (0.00) | -0.00 | (0.00) | -0.00 | (0.00) |
| Soil Erosion Perception | 0.22 | (0.25) | 0.48∗∗ | (0.20) | -0.24 | (0.23) |
| Slope (Steep = Base Category) | ||||||
| Slope Moderate | 0.57∗ | (0.29) | 0.57∗ | (0.29) | 0.57∗ | (0.29) |
| Slope Flat |
0.61∗ |
(0.34) |
0.61∗ |
(0.34) |
0.61 |
(0.34) |
| Soil Type (Clay = Base Category) | ||||||
| Soil Type Loam | 0.36 | (0.27) | 0.36 | (0.27) | 0.36 | (0.27) |
| Soil Type Sandy | 0.41 | (0.34) | 0.41 | (0.34) | 0.41 | (0.34) |
| TLU | 0.01 | (0.02) | 0.01 | (0.02) | 0.01 | (0.02) |
| Gender of HH | -0.52∗∗∗ | (0.19) | -0.522∗∗∗ | (0.18) | -0.52∗∗∗ | (0.18) |
| Age of HH | -0.01 | (0.01) | -0.005 | (0.01) | -0.01 | (0.01) |
| Education level of HH | 0.18 | (0.18) | 0.18 | (0.18) | 0.18 | (0.18) |
| Household size | -0.00 | (0.04) | -0.00 | (0.04) | -0.00 | (0.04) |
| HH Main Occupation | 0.05 | (0.18) | 0.05 | (0.18) | 0.05 | (0.18) |
| Crop Market Participation | -0.20 | (0.16) | -0.20 | (0.16) | -0.20 | (0.16) |
| Access Agricultural Loan | -0.66∗∗∗ | (0.19) | -0.66∗∗∗ | (0.19) | -0.66∗∗∗ | (0.19) |
| Wealth Category | -0.03 | (0.19) | -0.03 | (0.19) | -0.03 | (0.19) |
| Agricultural Group Membership | 0.72∗∗∗ | (0.27) | 0.37∗ | (0.20) | -0.06 | (0.21) |
| Distance to Local Market | -0.00 | (0.00) | -0.00 | (0.00) | -0.00 | (0.00) |
| _cons | 1.85 | (0.58) | 0.88 | (0.55) | -0.04 | (0.56) |
Note: Robust standard error in parenthesis, Statistical significance at ∗p < 0.1, ∗∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.01.
n = 640 (from Sample Size of 334 Households).
Log Pseudo likelihood = -791.02 Wald Chi-Square (25) = 97.29 ∗∗∗ Pseudo R2 = 7.04%.