Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 16;11:1409. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15141-y

Fig. 3. CO2RR performance.

Fig. 3

a Partial current and b Faradaic efficiency of CO for PcCu-O8-Zn/CNT, PcCu-O8-Cu/CNT, PcZn-O8-Zn/CNT and PcZn-O8-Cu/CNT at different potentials. c Faradaic efficiency of CO and H2 for PcCu-O8-Zn/CNT, PcCu-O8-Cu/CNT, PcZn-O8-Zn/CNT and PcZn-O8-Cu/CNT at −0.7 V vs. RHE. d Molar H2/CO ratio at different applied potentials of PcCu-O8-Zn/CNT. e Amperometry (i ~ t) stability and the according Faradaic efficiency for CO of PcCu-O8-Zn/CNT at −0.7 V vs. RHE in CO2-saturated 0.1 M KHCO3.