Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 22;31(3):533–545. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05228-8

Table 2.

Persistence to osteoporosis medications in the Drug-Specific cohort

Denosumab Oral BPs Parenteral BPs PTH SERM Strontium
All Naïve Non-naïve All Naïve Non-naïve All Naïve Non-naïve All Naïve Non-naïve All Naïve Non-naïve All Naïve Non-naïve
Na 1369 177 1192 161,121 44,835 116,286 81 18 63 91 13 78 1927 141 1786 10,794 1206 9588
Persistence (%) (95% CI)b
  6 months 70.1 (67.3–72.7) 63.8 (56.3–70.4) 71.3 (68.3–74.0) 39.7 (39.4–39.9) 62.4 (61.9–62.8) 30.6 (30.3–30.8) 100.0 100.0 100.0 19.8 (12.3–28.7) 15.4 (2.5–38.8) 20.6 (12.4–30.2) 30.2 (28.1–32.3) 53.2 (44.6–61.0) 28.3 (26.2–30.4) 24.6 (23.8–25.4) 41.0 (38.3–43.8) 22.4 (21.6–23.3)
  12 months 63.9 (60.8–66.7) 54.7 (46.8–62.0) 65.7 (62.4–68.7) 28.3 (28.1–28.6) 50.8 (50.3–51.2) 19.2 (19.0–19.5) 22.7 (13.5–33.4) 12.5 (2.1–32.8) 26.0 (14.9–38.6) 6.3 (2.4–13.0) 6.9 (2.6–14.1) 19.4 (17.7–21.3) 42.2 (33.9–50.2) 17.6 (15.8–19.4) 14.1 (13.5–14.8) 29.7 (27.1–32.3) 12.1 (11.4–12.8)
  18 months 57.0 (53.8–60.1) 47.7 (39.7–55.2) 58.9 (55.4–62.3) 22.8 (22.6–23.0) 43.5 (43.0–43.9) 14.4 (14.2–14.6) 22.7 (13.5–33.4) 12.5 (2.1–32.8) 26.0 (14.9–38.6) 1.3 (0.1–6.1) 1.4 (0.1–6.5) 15.2 (13.6–17.0) 36.7 (28.6–44.7) 13.5 (11.8–15.2) 9.7 (9.2–10.3) 22.8 (20.4–25.3) 8.1 (7.5–8.6)
  24 months 50.0 (46.3–53.5) 36.0 (27.4–44.7) 52.8 (48.9–56.6) 19.0 (18.8–19.2) 37.7 (37.2–38.2) 11.3 (11.1–11.5) 15.2 (7.5–25.3) 0.0 18.9 (9.3–31.1) 0.0 12.9 (11.4–14.6) 32.9 (25.0–41.0) 11.3 (9.8–12.9) 6.9 (6.4–7.4) 16.9 (14.7–19.2) 5.6 (5.1–6.1)
  36 months 41.5 (36.9–46.1) 28.0 (16.9–40.2) 44.0 (38.9–49.0) 13.9 (13.7–14.1) 29.3 (28.8–29.8) 7.6 (7.4–7.8) 15.2 (7.5–25.3) 0.0 18.9 (9.3–31.1) 0.0 9.1 (7.6–10.6) 24.8 (17.2–33.1) 7.7 (6.4–9.3) 3.7 (3.3–4.1) 8.5 (6.8–10.5) 3.1 (2.7–3.5)
  60 months 16.1 (1.9–42.9) 17.1 (2.0–45.2) 7.8 (7.5–8.0) 18.0 (17.4–18.6) 3.6 (3.4–3.8) 2.7 (0.2–11.6) 0.0 3.4 (0.3–14.1) 0.0 4.5 (3.1–6.3) 22.3 (14.4–31.3) 3.1 (1.9–4.8) 0.9 (0.6–1.2) 2.3 (1.1–4.3) 0.7 (0.4–1.0)

Patients could receive multiple drug classes during the observation period. Each patient could therefore have several non-treatment-naïve records but only one treatment-naïve record

BP bisphosphonate, CI confidence interval, PTH parathyroid hormone, SERM selective estrogen receptor modulators

aNumber of records. Patients could contribute multiple records

bPersistence probabilities were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methodology