TABLE 4.
Correlations among child reports of victimization and study variables (n = 73 to 80).
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | |
1. Child reports of victimization | 1 | ||||||||||||
2. Parent reports of victimizationa | 0.28* | 1 | |||||||||||
3. Family type (1 = LG) | 0.13 | −0.20+ | 1 | ||||||||||
4. Urbanicity | −0.22+ | –0.01 | –0.05 | 1 | |||||||||
5. CBCL total scorea | 0.29* | 0.43*** | –0.14 | –0.11 | 1 | ||||||||
6. Percent voting Democrat | 0.21+ | 0.01 | 0.24* | −0.39** | 0.06 | 1 | |||||||
7. Child of color | –0.16 | <0.01 | 0.14 | 0.02 | –0.08 | –0.03 | 1 | ||||||
8. Child’s age | –0.03 | 0.13 | –0.08 | 0.17 | –0.06 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 1 | |||||
9. Child gender (1 = male) | –0.05 | 0.09 | –0.10 | 0.03 | −0.20+ | 0.15 | –0.02 | –0.11 | 1 | ||||
10. Parent educationa | 0.03 | –0.09 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.13 | –0.05 | 0.14 | –0.10 | –0.08 | 1 | |||
11. Family income | 0.05 | –0.07 | 0.24* | –0.04 | –0.12 | 0.37** | 0.01 | –0.09 | 0.04 | 0.23+ | 1 | ||
12. School social climatea | –0.12 | –0.18 | 0.08 | −0.19+ | −0.32** | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.08 | –0.12 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 1 | |
13. Public school | 0.03 | 0.10 | –0.10 | 0.03 | 0.17 | −0.22+ | –0.08 | −0.21+ | –0.10 | –0.06 | −0.30* | −0.31** | 1 |
+p < 0.10, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. aThe parents’ data was averaged for this correlation matrix. Correlations are provided for the child data only because a full reporting of relationships was not included in the main text, as it was for the parent data.