Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 10;11:372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00372

TABLE 4.

Correlations among child reports of victimization and study variables (n = 73 to 80).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1. Child reports of victimization 1
2. Parent reports of victimizationa 0.28* 1
3. Family type (1 = LG) 0.13 −0.20+ 1
4. Urbanicity −0.22+ –0.01 –0.05 1
5. CBCL total scorea 0.29* 0.43*** –0.14 –0.11 1
6. Percent voting Democrat 0.21+ 0.01 0.24* −0.39** 0.06 1
7. Child of color –0.16 <0.01 0.14 0.02 –0.08 –0.03 1
8. Child’s age –0.03 0.13 –0.08 0.17 –0.06 0.02 0.13 1
9. Child gender (1 = male) –0.05 0.09 –0.10 0.03 −0.20+ 0.15 –0.02 –0.11 1
10. Parent educationa 0.03 –0.09 0.15 0.03 0.13 –0.05 0.14 –0.10 –0.08 1
11. Family income 0.05 –0.07 0.24* –0.04 –0.12 0.37** 0.01 –0.09 0.04 0.23+ 1
12. School social climatea –0.12 –0.18 0.08 −0.19+ −0.32** 0.17 0.16 0.08 –0.12 0.02 0.11 1
13. Public school 0.03 0.10 –0.10 0.03 0.17 −0.22+ –0.08 −0.21+ –0.10 –0.06 −0.30* −0.31** 1

+p < 0.10, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. aThe parents’ data was averaged for this correlation matrix. Correlations are provided for the child data only because a full reporting of relationships was not included in the main text, as it was for the parent data.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure