Acien 1989.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling |
Primary objective: to measure the levels of CA‐125 in the serum of normal women and in patients with endometriosis before, during and after treatment with danazol or a luteinising hormone‐releasing hormone agonist, to evaluate the influence of these treatments on the levels of CA‐125 and the possible relation with reactivation of endometriosis after treatment Participants: women with endometriosis confirmed by laparoscopy and a group of regularly menstruating women with a normal pelvis at laparoscopy Selection criteria: not specified Study design: longitudinal, two‐gate design, prospective collection of samples |
||
Patient characteristics and setting |
Clinical presentation: endometriosis group ‐ infertility in 70.4%, not specified otherwise Age: range 22‐43 years Number of participants enrolled: 68 women (11 postmenopausal women were enrolled and analysed separately ‐ not considered in this review) Number of participants available for analysis: 68 women (all in luteal cycle phase) Setting: not stated; authors' affiliations: the Royal Free (University) Hospital, London; and School of Medicine, University of Alicante, Spain Place of study: not specified, Europe Period of study: not stated Language: English |
||
Index tests |
Index test: CA‐125 Details of the index test procedure as stated: serum CA‐125 was measured with an immunoradiometric assay (Abbot CA‐125 RIA); working assay range was 6‐500 U/ml. sample processing and experiments not described Threshold for positive result: > 30 U/ml, not pre‐specified Examiners: no information provided; unclear if blinded to the result of reference standard Interobserver variability: interassay and intra‐assay CV 3.5%‐6.4% |
||
Target condition and reference standard(s) |
Target condition: endometriosis Prevalence of target condition in the sample: n = 54/68 (79%): stage I‐II 40, stage III‐IV 14; controls n = 14 Reference standard: laparoscopy N = 68 (100%) Description of positive case definition by reference standard as reported: visual inspection, staging according to the rAFS classification Examiners: no information provided |
||
Flow and timing |
Time interval between index test and reference standard: samples were taken at laparoscopy Withdrawals: none |
||
Comparative | |||
Key conclusions by the authors | Increases in CA‐125 values above 30 U/ml were more likely to indicate reactivation of endometriosis than when CA‐125 did not increase | ||
Conflict of interest | Not reported | ||
Notes | The reported CA‐125 values during and after treatment with Danazol or GnRH analogues are not included in this review Additional control group of postmenopausal women (N = 11) was not considered in calculation of diagnostic estimates |
||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | No | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Unclear | ||
Was a 'two‐gate' design avoided? | No | ||
High | High | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Unclear | ||
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | No | ||
Was a cycle phase considered in interpretation of the result of index test? | Yes | ||
Unclear | Low | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | Unclear | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Yes | ||
Unclear | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | Yes | ||
Low |