Skip to main content
. 2016 May 1;2016(5):CD012179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012179

Acien 1989.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Primary objective: to measure the levels of CA‐125 in the serum of normal women and in patients with endometriosis before, during and after treatment with danazol or a luteinising hormone‐releasing hormone agonist, to evaluate the influence of these treatments on the levels of CA‐125 and the possible relation with reactivation of endometriosis after treatment
Participants: women with endometriosis confirmed by laparoscopy and a group of regularly menstruating women with a normal pelvis at laparoscopy
Selection criteria: not specified
Study design: longitudinal, two‐gate design, prospective collection of samples
Patient characteristics and setting Clinical presentation: endometriosis group ‐ infertility in 70.4%, not specified otherwise
Age: range 22‐43 years
Number of participants enrolled: 68 women (11 postmenopausal women were enrolled and analysed separately ‐ not considered in this review)
Number of participants available for analysis: 68 women (all in luteal cycle phase)
Setting: not stated; authors' affiliations: the Royal Free (University) Hospital, London; and School of Medicine, University of Alicante, Spain
Place of study: not specified, Europe
Period of study: not stated
Language: English
Index tests Index test: CA‐125
Details of the index test procedure as stated: serum CA‐125 was measured with an immunoradiometric assay (Abbot CA‐125 RIA); working assay range was 6‐500 U/ml. sample processing and experiments not described
Threshold for positive result: > 30 U/ml, not pre‐specified
Examiners: no information provided; unclear if blinded to the result of reference standard
Interobserver variability: interassay and intra‐assay CV 3.5%‐6.4%
Target condition and reference standard(s) Target condition: endometriosis
Prevalence of target condition in the sample: n = 54/68 (79%): stage I‐II 40, stage III‐IV 14; controls n = 14
Reference standard: laparoscopy N = 68 (100%)
Description of positive case definition by reference standard as reported: visual inspection, staging according to the rAFS classification
Examiners: no information provided
Flow and timing Time interval between index test and reference standard: samples were taken at laparoscopy
Withdrawals: none
Comparative  
Key conclusions by the authors Increases in CA‐125 values above 30 U/ml were more likely to indicate reactivation of endometriosis than when CA‐125 did not increase
Conflict of interest Not reported
Notes The reported CA‐125 values during and after treatment with Danazol or GnRH analogues are not included in this review
Additional control group of postmenopausal women (N = 11) was not considered in calculation of diagnostic estimates
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? No    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
Was a 'two‐gate' design avoided? No    
    High High
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? No    
Was a cycle phase considered in interpretation of the result of index test? Yes    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Yes    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Yes    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes    
    Low