Fassbender 2009.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling |
Primary objective: to test the hypothesis that the plasma concentration of complement factor C3a (anaphylatoxin) can be used as a non‐invasive test in the diagnosis of endometriosis Participants: women who had undergone laparoscopic surgery for subfertility, pelvic pain or both Selection criteria: not specified Study design: cross‐sectional prospective single‐gate design, non‐consecutive enrolment |
||
Patient characteristics and setting |
Clinical presentation: infertility ‐ 160, dysmenorrhoea ‐ 26, hx of hormonal treatment, chronic PID or STI ‐ nil; ethnicity: Caucasian ‐ 136, other ‐ 24 Age: median (range) 30 (18–46) years (endometriosis), 33 (20–46) years (controls) Number of participants enrolled: 160 women Number of participants available for analysis: 160 women (49 in menstrual, 55 in follicular, 56 in luteal cycle phase) Setting: Leuven University Fertility Centre Place of study: Leuven, Belgium Period of study: not stated Language: English |
||
Index tests |
Index test: C3a (anaphylatoxin) Details of the index test procedure as stated: plasma concentration of C3a‐des‐Arg was determined with a commercially available immunoassay (Quidel Inc, San Diego, USA); quantification with a standard curve; sensitivity of this experiment was 34 ng/ml; sample handling and laboratory technique described in details Threshold for positive result: not reported Examiners: no information provided; unclear if were blinded to the results of reference standard Interobserver variability: Intra‐and interassay CV ranged 1.5%‐2.8% and 11%‐23% |
||
Target condition and reference standard(s) |
Target condition: endometriosis Prevalence of target condition in the sample: n = 109/160 (68%); severity: stage I‐II 54, stage III‐IV 55; controls n = 51 Reference standard: laparoscopy N = 160 (100%) + histology Description of positive case definition by reference standard test as reported: visualisation at surgery with subsequent histological confirmation; staging according to the rAFS classification Examiners: no information provided |
||
Flow and timing |
Time interval between index test and reference standard: blood was collected immediately before surgery Withdrawals: none |
||
Comparative | |||
Key conclusions by the authors | Our data do not confirm our hypothesis that C3a‐des‐Arg concentration in plasma can be used as a biomarker for the non‐invasive diagnosis of endometriosis, but does not rule out the possibility that that measurement of complement activation at the level of the cervix or endometrium may be useful for this purpose | ||
Conflict of interest | Not reported; supported by the Flemish fund for scientific research (FWO) & Leuven University Council (Dienst Onderzoekscoordinatie KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium) | ||
Notes | For C3a there was no difference between the groups ‐ no data available for meta‐analysis | ||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | No | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Yes | ||
Was a 'two‐gate' design avoided? | Yes | ||
High | Low | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Unclear | ||
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | No | ||
Was a cycle phase considered in interpretation of the result of index test? | Yes | ||
High | Low | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | Yes | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | Yes | ||
Low |