Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 16;8(3):2325967120906522. doi: 10.1177/2325967120906522

Table A1.

Side-to-Side Comparison at 6- and 12-Month Follow-upa

 6 mo 12 mo P Valueb
n Injured Uninjured P Value n Injured Uninjured P Value
Total concentric work, J
 EFM group 78 1382.4 ± 654.4 (0.0-3760.9) 2367.7 ± 647.6 (1120.9-3966.3) <.001 83 1776.1 ± 677.8 (176.2-3602.6) 2446.1 ± 728.6 (916.0-4338.8) <.001 <.001
 Control group 42 1531.1 ± 651.6 (45.1-2630.8) 2596.7 ± 817.5 (880.4-4376.5) <.001 40 2077.8 ± 744.4 (272.6-4373.2) 2675.6 ± 798.9 (1094.0-4895.7) <.001 <.001
No. of heel rises
 EFM group 78 22.0 ± 8.3 (0-54) 27.6 ± 6.9 (14-46) <.001 83 25.7 ± 8.1 (4-50) 28.0 ± 7.2 (15-49) .001 <.001
 Control group 42 23.4 ± 8.6 (3-57) 29.2 ± 8.8 (15-59) <.001 40 27.7 ± 9.3 (12-59) 29.3 ± 8.8 (16-60) .078 <.001
Maximum height of heel rise, cm
 EFM group 78 9.9 ± 2.5 (0.0-15.3) 13.7 ± 1.8 (10.1-17.5) <.001 83 11.0 ± 2.4 (5.9-15.6) 14.0 ± 2.0 (9.2-19.6) <.001 <.001
 Control group 42 10.0 ± 2.9 (2.3-14.7) 13.7 ± 2.1 (9.1-17.5) <.001 40 11.9 ± 2.3 (4.1-16.3) 14.3 ± 1.9 (11.0-18.7) <.001 <.001

aValues are reported as mean ± SD (range). Bolded values indicate statistical significance (P < .05). EFM, early functional mobilization.

bComparison of the injured side between the 6- and 12-month follow-up.