Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 31;2016(8):CD001500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001500.pub3

Dessole 2004.

Methods Method of randomisation: not stated
 Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled. Number of participants randomised: n = 88
 Number of participants analysed: n = 88
 Number of withdrawals: 4 in treatment group and 7 in placebo group (discomfort experienced: 2 in treatment and 2 in placebo group, localised adverse reactions (burning and itching) 2 in treatment group and 1 in placebo group; and 4 in the control group did not benefit from therapy
 Power calculation and ITT analysis performed
 Source of funding: not stated
Participants Inclusion criteria: participants presented with symptoms and signs of urinary stress incontinence, vaginal atrophy, and histories of recurrent urinary tract infections. None had received oestrogen before the study
 Age: 54‐62 years
 Source of participants: not stated
 Exclusion criteria: women with anatomical lesions of the urogenital tract, such as uterovaginal prolapse, cystocele, and rectocele of grade II or III, presence of severe systemic disorders, thromboembolic diseases, bilary lithiasis, previous breast or uterine cancer, abnormal uterine bleeding, and body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or higher
 Location: Sardinia
Interventions Treatment: intravaginal oestradiol ovules (1 mg) once daily for 2 weeks and then 2 ovules once weekly for 6 months
 Control: placebo vaginal ovules same regimen
 Duration: 6 months
Outcomes Vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, vaginal pH, KPI of vaginal epithelium
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias) Low risk Double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Some outcomes were self‐assessed but unclear whether other outcome assessors were blinded e.g. the pathologists
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Data analysed on the basis of ITT
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to make a conclusive judgement
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to make a conclusive judgement