Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 22;12(2):190. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12020190

Table 5.

Summary of the study results per disease. Statistically significant differences in adherence outcomes are presented and considered.

Disease Comparison of Adherence Outcome between FDCT and MPT; Number of Studies with Certain Result Is Given in Parenthesis References
CVD
(n = 11)
FDCT > MPT (n = 9) [35,45,48,49,52,59,60,62,63]
FDCT = MPT (n = 1) [58]
Inconclusive * (n = 1) [61]
HT
(n = 31)
FDCT > MPT (n = 28) [5,33,38,39,40,41,42,46,53,55,56,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,77,78,79,81,82,83]
FDCT = MPT (n = 2) [75,76]
Inconclusive * (n = 1) [80]
DMII
(n = 10)
FDCT > MPT (n = 9) [31,32,36,44,51,54,84,85,86]
Inconclusive * (n = 1) [43]
HIV (n = 14) FDCT > MPT (n = 10) [30,37,57,87,88,89,91,92,93,94]
FDCT = MPT (n = 3) [34,50,90]
Inconclusive * (n = 1) [47]
Other (n = 1) FDCT = MPT (n = 1) [95]

* Several outcomes were observed (FDCT < MPT or FDCT > MPT or FDCT = MPT). See Table A2 (Appendix B) and Table A3 (Appendix C) for additional information. FDCT, fixed-dose combination therapy; MPT, multipill therapy; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DMII, diabetes mellitus type 2; LUTS/BHP, Lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.