TABLE 2.

Results for Conditional Process Analyses (N = 204)

	B (SE)	p	95% CI: [LL, UL]
Physical IPV Model
Outcome: Social disconnection
Intercept	.63 (.11)	< .001*	[.41, .84]
Physical IPV	.17 (.04)	< .001*	[.10, .24]
Outcome: Sexual risk behavior
Intercept	−3.10 (.88)	< .001*	[−4.83, −1.38]
Physical IPV	.12 (.12)	.383	[−.15, .39]
Social disconnection	.51 (.26)	.047**	[.01, 1.02]
No. close friends	−.27 (.26)	.309	[−.78, .25]
Social disconnection × No. close friends	−.68 (.33)	.038**	[−1.31, −.04]
Sexual IPV Model
Outcome: Social disconnection
Intercept	.90 (.08)	< .001*	[.75, 1.05]
Sexual IPV	.18 (.06)	.003*	[.06, .29]
Outcome: Sexual risk behavior
Intercept	−3.32 (.87)	< .001*	[−5.03, −1.61]
Sexual IPV	.53 (.22)	.017**	[.10, .97]
Social disconnection	1.55 (.52)	.003*	[.53, 1.57]
No. close friends	.45 (.49)	.364	[−.52, 1.41]
Social disconnection × No. close friends	−.74 (.33)	.024**	[−1.38, −.10]

Note. IPV = intimate partner violence.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.