Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;20:34. doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-2835-7

Table 1.

GP prevents HFD-induced hyperlipidemia

TC (mmol/L) TG (mmol/L) LDL-C (mmol/L) HDL-C (mmol/L)
NAFLD 2.14 ± 0.26 0.63 ± 0.04 1.61 ± 0.10 0.32 ± 0.17
Control 1.26 ± 0.24** 0.50 ± 0.07** 1.26 ± 0.34* 0.47 ± 0.15**
DLPC 1.98 ± 0.62 0.51 ± 0.08* 1.15 ± 0.25** 0.47 ± 0.21*
GPL 1.87 ± 0.33 0.48 ± 0.07** 1.14 ± 0.21** 0.39 ± 0.12
GPM 1.69 ± 0.28* 0.48 ± 0.07** 1.16 ± 0.36** 0.51 ± 0.08**
GPH 1.29 ± 0.27** 0.49 ± 0.16** 1.14 ± 0.24** 0.54 ± 0.09**

Serum concentrations of TC, TG, LDL-C and HDL-C in each group compared with NAFLD group (n = 10 for each group). Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Whereas * and ** represent statistically significant results (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, respectively) based on Newman–Keuls post hoc one-way ANOVA analysis. GPL: low dose of GP treatment; GPM: middle dose of GP treatment; GPH: high dose of GP treatment