Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;24(5):2802–2818. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14708

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The efficiency of ADV2‐Foxf2 and ADV4‐Smad6 in rat endometrium. (A) Fluorescence analysis of uterine frozen section after transfected with ADV2‐Foxf2 or ADV4‐Smad6 (n = 3). The ADV2‐Foxf2‐1810 carried red fluorescence, and the ADV4‐Smad6 carried green fluorescence. (B) qRT‐PCR analysis of Foxf2 and Smad6 expression in rat endometrium after transfected with ADV2‐Foxf2‐1810 or ADV4‐Smad6. The red histogram represented relative Foxf2 mRNA expression, and ADV2‐FOXF2‐1810 decreased Foxf2 mRNA expression significantly compared with normal and ADV2‐negative control groups (P < .05). The green histogram represented relative Smad6 mRNA expression. ADV4‐Smad6 up‐regulated Smad6 mRNA expression significantly compared with normal and ADV4‐negative control groups (P < .05)