Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 16;2020(3):CD011154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011154.pub2

IRCT20170806035524N5.

Trial name or title Comparing efficacy of combination therapy with niosomal benzoyl peroxide 1% ‐ clindamycin 1% versus niosomal clindamycin 1% in acne vulgaris: a randomized clinical trial
Methods Study design: parallel, triple‐blind design
Duration of follow‐up: 12 weeks
Participants Inclusion criteria
  • Male or female aged 12 to 30 years

  • Mild to moderate acne vulgaris


Exclusion criteria
  • Pregnancy or lactation

  • History of allergy to clindamycin or BPO

  • Previous history of inflammatory bowel disease, colitis, polycystic ovary syndrome, or hirsutism

  • Taking neuromuscular blocker or oral anti‐acne drug since 6 months ago

  • Topical anti‐acne drug since 1 month ago


Sites of acne: face
Interventions Interventions in Group A
  • Topical treatment: BPO plus clindamycin

  • Regimen: leave‐on

  • Concentration: BPO: 1%; clindamycin: 1%

  • Vehicle: BPO: gel; clindamycin: lotion

  • Dose: twice daily

  • Duration: 12 weeks


Interventions in Group B
  • Topical treatment: clindamycin

  • Regimen: leave‐on

  • Concentration: 1%

  • Vehicle: gel

  • Dose: twice daily

  • Duration: 12 weeks

Outcomes Primary outcomes of review interest
  • None


Secondary outcomes of review interest
  • Inflammatory and non‐inflammatory acne lesion count

  • Quality of life assessed via Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) questionnaire


Other outcomes reported in the study
  • Acne lesion severity measured by physician using GAGS (Global Acne Grading System)

  • Side effects (erythema, scaling, and pruritus)

Starting date June 2018
Contact information Mahin Aflatoonian
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
maaflatoonian@gmail.com
Notes