Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 10;159(4):384–392. doi: 10.1111/imm.13168

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Functional analysis of KWV3.1‐transfected T cells. (a) Flow cytometric analysis of KWV3.1‐transfected T cells. The mRNA encoding KWV3.1 α‐ and β‐chains or buffer alone (control) were electroporated in T cells activated by CD3/CD28 beads. The electroporated T cells were stained with anti‐mouse T‐cell receptor‐β chain (mTRBC) antibody or AFP2–11/HLA‐A24 tetramer and analyzed on a flow cytometer. (b) Specific activation of KWV3.1‐transfected T cells against T2‐A24 cells pulsed with various concentrations of AFP2–11. Interferon‐γ (IFN‐γ) release was determined by elispot assay. The irrelevant peptide‐pulsed T2‐A24 and the unpulsed T2‐A24 were used as negative controls. (c) Specific activation of KWV3.1‐transfected T cells co‐cultured with tumor cell lines. KWV3.1‐transfected T cells were specifically activated by HepG2 (AFP+ HLA‐A24+) and SNU398‐AFP (AFP overexpressed, HLA‐A24+), but not by SNU398 (AFP HLA‐A24+). IFN‐γ release was determined by elispot assay. A6 was used as a negative TCR control. (d) Cytotoxicity of KWV3.1‐transfected T cells against T2‐A24 loaded with varied concentrations of AFP2–11 peptide. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay was implemented at an effector : target ratio of 5 : 1. The A6‐transfected T cells incubated with T2‐A24 loaded with 10−6 m AFP2–11 were used as negative control. (e) The cytotoxic activity of KWV3.1‐transfected T cells against AFP‐expressing tumor cell lines at effector : target ratios of 1 : 1, 3 : 1, 5 : 1 and 10 : 1. A6 was used as a negative TCR control. Error bars indicate standard deviation of triplicate measurements