Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 13;25(2):293–298. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.12.006

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Patient 2(a) Synchronized 4D CT contrast showing peak HU of 161 in average intensity projection (AIP). (b) Diagnostic 3D CT contrast of same slide showing peak HU 0f 168. (c) Diagnostic non contrast scan.(d) DRR showing Synchronized 4D CT scan length. L0, Ls, TSCANDELAY and corresponding aortic enhancement at 4D CT scan length and LOI.