Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;11(1):88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.01.002

Table 5.

Mediating effects of burnout on the relationship between emotional disharmony and hurt and turnover intention (n = 606)

Variable Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Emotional disharmony and hurt -> burnout
Emotional disharmony and hurt -> turnover
Burnout -> turnover
B(SE) β p B(SE) β p B(SE) β p
(Constant) 10.400 (1.087) 10.888 (1.359) 8.856 (1.442)
Control variables Age(30 vs 20) -0.549 (0.258) -0.76 0.034 -0.958 (0.323) -0.115 0.003 -0.851 (0.321) -0.102 0.008
Age(40 vs 20) -1.091 (0.354) -0.113 0.002 -2.887 (0.442) -0.258 <0.001 -2.674 (0.440) -0.239 <0.001
Age(50 vs 20) -3.237 (1.297) -0.085 0.013 -7.120 (1.622) -0.161 <0.001 -6.487 (1.612) -0.147 <0.001
Shift work 0.541 (0.323) 0.059 0.094 1.269 (0.403) 0.119 0.002 1.163 (0.400) 0.109 0.004
Working hours 0.003 (0.022) 0.005 0.890 0.107 (0.028) 0.141 <0.001 0.106 (0.028) 0.140 <0.001
Independent variable Emotional disharmony and hurt 0.086 (0.005) 0.539 <0.001 0.043 (0.007) 0.235 <0.001 0.026 (0.008) 0.144 0.001
Parameter Burnout 0.195 (0.051) 0.169 <0.001
Adjusted R2 0.320 0.207 0.225
F 48.434 27.364 26.140
P <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Sobel test Z = 3.73, p=<0.001.