Vacarezza 2010.
Methods | Randomised, double‐blinded study (outpatients), single‐blinded (inpatients) | |
Participants | Adult males and females > 18 years | |
Interventions | Oral clarithromycin versus oral amoxicillin for outpatients study arm | |
Outcomes | Primary: clinical response. Secondary: adverse effects | |
Notes | Article in Spanish; translation done by Dr. RA Rodriguez, Dr. Gonzalo Alvarez and Dr. Jacqueline Sandoz (Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa) Hospitalised patients are included in the study but separate results for inpatients and outpatients are provided. Study conducted in Uruguay |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Block randomisation by PORT score was used |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not explicitly stated |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No explicit mention of patient and assessor blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No CONSORT diagram presented, therefore reasons for exclusion of patients at the entry level are unclear |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The study reported on every patient that was included in the trial |
Other bias | Low risk | No financial conflicts |