Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 9;2014(10):CD002109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002109.pub4

Vacarezza 2010.

Methods Randomised, double‐blinded study (outpatients), single‐blinded (inpatients)
Participants Adult males and females > 18 years
Interventions Oral clarithromycin versus oral amoxicillin for outpatients study arm
Outcomes Primary: clinical response. Secondary: adverse effects
Notes Article in Spanish; translation done by Dr. RA Rodriguez, Dr. Gonzalo Alvarez and Dr. Jacqueline Sandoz (Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa)
Hospitalised patients are included in the study but separate results for inpatients and outpatients are provided. Study conducted in Uruguay
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Block randomisation by PORT score was used
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not explicitly stated
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No explicit mention of patient and assessor blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No CONSORT diagram presented, therefore reasons for exclusion of patients at the entry level are unclear
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The study reported on every patient that was included in the trial
Other bias Low risk No financial conflicts