. 2020 Mar 3;8(3):e16956. doi: 10.2196/16956

Table 2.

Correlations between Mobile App Rating Scale in Arabic and Mobile App Rating Scale-English domains and total app quality.

Mobile App Rating Scale in Arabic	Mobile App Rating Scale in English								5-star rating
	A	B	C	D	App quality	E	E4
Engagement (A)	0.89^a,b	0.64^a,c	0.90^a,c	0.92^a,c	0.97^a,c	0.90^a,c	0.88^a,c	−0.04^c
Functionality (B)	0.61^a,d	0.69^a,b	0.70^a,c	0.61^a,c	0.75^a,c	0.70^a,c	0.48^a,c	−0.03^c
Aesthetics (C)	0.89^a,d	0.68^a,d	0.83^a,b	0.86^a,c	0.96^a,c	0.91^a,c	0.78^a,c	0.03^c
Information Quality (D)	0.92^a,d	0.55^a,d	0.81^a,d	0.85^a,b	0.95^a,c	0.84^a,c	0.80^a,c	−0.14^c
App quality score (average A-D)	0.96^a,d	0.72^a,d	0.95^a,d	0.93^a,d	0.90^a,b	0.92^a,c	0.84^a,c	−0.05^c
Subjective quality score (E)	0.88^a,d	0.67^a,d	0.82^a,d	0.87^a,d	0.90^a,d	0.82^a,b	0.78^a,c	−0.07^c
Subjective quality item number 4: 5-star rating (E4)	0.83^a,d	0.62^a,d	0.80^a,d	0.78^a,d	0.85^a,d	0.83^a,d	0.82^a,b	0.00^c
5-star rating (app stores)	−0.05^d	0.04^d	0.03^d	−0.11^d	−0.04^d	−0.07^d	−0.09^d	1.00^b

^aP<.001.

^bThe diagonal shows the correlations between the same constructs of the MARS English and Arabic.

^cIn the upper diagonal section of the table: correlations among Mobile App Rating Scale subdomains, total app quality, and subjective quality (Mobile App Rating Scale in Arabic).

^dIn the lower diagonal section of the table: correlations among Mobile App Rating Scale subdomains (English).