Jennings 2015e.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Data | Setting: primary care, UK. Participants were 199 people who were 18 to 80 years with at least 1 component of the metabolic syndrome | |
Comparisons | Investigated effect of financial incentive on recruitment Intervention: offer of GBP 100 Comparison: no offer |
|
Outcomes | Proportion recruited to trial | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Description |
Random Sequence generation ok? | Yes | Done centrally using computer algorithm. There was a slight imbalance in favour of control because of algorithm used but allocation still random |
Allocation concealment? | Yes | Done centrally |
Blinding of participants and personnel ok? | Yes | Research nurses and staff not blinded but invitations sent out to patients on GP list so staff can not influence response. Participants blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment ok? | Yes | Objective outcome |
Incomplete outcome data handled ok? | Yes | Adequate |
Free of selective reporting? | Yes | Recruitment data reported, which is all the review needs |
Was the study free of other bias? | Yes | No other biases apparent |
Overall bias? | No | Low risk of bias |