Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 14;26(3):1259–1270. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14952

Table 2.

Results from the four mixed‐effects models used to study the drivers of community composition

Variable DCA 1 South DCA 2 South DCA 1 North DCA 2 North
Effect sizes (β)
Intercept −1.00 (−1.25, −0.75) −1.43 (−1.73, −1.13) −1.79 (−2.07, −1.49) −0.96 (−1.22, −0.70)
Latitude 0.09 (−0.01, 0.19) −0.11 (−0.18, −0.04) −0.19 (−0.27, −0.12) 0.13 (0.04, 0.22)
Size 0.17 (0.09, 0.25) −0.01 (−0.07, 0.04) 0.06 (0, 0.12) −0.08 (−0.16, −0.01)
Richness 0.02 (0, 0.04) −0.03 (−0.05, −0.01) 0.01 (−0.02, 0.03) 0.02 (−0.01, 0.05)
Alkalinity 0.04 (0.02, 0.05) 0 (−0.01, 0.01) 0.05 (0.02, 0.07) 0.04 (0.01, 0.07)
Total phosphorus 0.07 (0.01, 0.12) 0 (−0.04, 0.04) 0.06 (0.02, 0.1) −0.03 (−0.08, 0.03)
Variance estimates (σ 2)
Lake 0.26 (0.19, 0.35) 0.12 (0.09, 0.17) 0.12 (0.09, 0.17) 0.16 (0.11, 0.22)
Year 0.00 (0.00, 0.01) 0.00 (0.00, 0.01) 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) 0.00 (0.00, 0.01)

In this table, we present results of effects on detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) 1 and 2 scores, as measures of community composition. Models were performed separately for DCA axes 1 and 2 and for the two ecoregions (north and south). We present mean and 95% credible intervals for fixed and random effects. We also depict in bold those fixed‐effect estimates where the 95% credible intervals did not overlap zero.