Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 19;76(1):197–209. doi: 10.1111/biom.13119

Table 1.

Comparison of performance measures for a two‐armed trial using different designs when the variance is assumed unknown (with the exception of FLGI‐known) and T=72, averaged over 50 000 trial replications

μ0=μ1=0.155
μ0=0.155,μ1=0.529
Design
t1α
α
E(p*) (SD) Rel ETO% (SD) Bias (SD)
1β
E(p*) (SD) Rel ETO% (SD) Bias (SD)
ER
b = 1 1.654 0.0518 0.49990 (0.06) –0.19 (5.45) –0.0005 (0.15) 0.7884 0.5005 (0.06) 0.20 (5.66) –0.0013 (0.15)
FLGI‐known
b=1
1.991 0.0526 0.4997 (0.33) –0.06 (5.42) –0.0004 (0.49) 0.2290 0.8823 (0.16) 41.69 (7.01) 0.2167 (0.45)
b=2
1.969 0.0505 0.5002 (0.32) 0.34 (5.42) –0.0003 (0.44) 0.2701 0.8777 (0.16) 41.27 (6.85) 0.1870 (0.41)
b=6
1.911 0.0481 0.4987 (0.29) –0.03 (5.45) 0.0010 (0.34) 0.3599 0.8605 (0.14) 39.38 (6.59) 0.1147 (0.30)
b=9
1.864 0.0492 0.4983 (0.28) –0.15 (5.43) 0.0008 (0.30) 0.4235 0.8483 (0.13) 38.14 (6.53) 0.0843 (0.26)
b=18
1.766 0.0513 0.5017 (0.24) 0.14 (5.44) –0.0010 (0.23) 0.5653 0.8074 (0.12) 33.72 (6.30) 0.0389 (0.20)
b=36
1.682 0.0495 0.5000 (0.19) 0.26 (5.45) 0.0001 (0.17) 0.7124 0.7139 (0.09) 23.25 (5.98) 0.0087 (0.17)
FLGI
b=1
2.1820 0.0525 0.5013 (0.29) –0.15 (5.43) 0.0013 (0.29) 0.3289 0.8712 (0.12) 40.62 (6.39) 0.0955 (0.27)
b=2
2.1590 0.0497 0.5016 (0.28) 0.21 (5.45) 0.0014 (0.28) 0.3432 0.8651 (0.12) 39.95 (6.41) 0.0902 (0.26)
b=6
2.1180 0.0477 0.4985 (0.27) 0.18 (5.42) –0.0008 (0.26) 0.3790 0.8521 (0.12) 38.48 (6.36) 0.0801 (0.25)
b=9
2.0450 0.0514 0.5011 (0.26) –0.01 (5.41) 0.0019 (0.25) 0.4236 0.8412 (0.12) 37.13 (6.36) 0.0698 (0.24)
b=18
1.8980 0.0517 0.5008 (0.24) –0.04 (5.42) 0.0005 (0.22) 0.5277 0.8047 (0.12) 33.30 (6.23) 0.0356 (0.20)
b=36
1.7330 0.0505 0.4997 (0.18) 0.01 (5.43) –0.0009 (0.18) 0.6973 0.7128 (0.09) 23.23 (6.00) 0.0097 (0.17)
FLGI‐HZ (γ=2)
b=1
1.658 0.0509 0.5000 (0.05) 0.12 (5.43) 0.0008 (0.15) 0.6510 0.7784 (0.04) 30.46 (5.51) 0.0001 (0.18)
b=2
1.660 0.0509 0.5003 (0.05) –0.14 (5.44) 0.0004 (0.15) 0.6499 0.7786 (0.04) 30.61 (5.54) –0.0007 (0.18)
b=6
1.688 0.0487 0.5001 (0.05) 0.16 (5.42) 0.0000 (0.15) 0.6417 0.7781 (0.04) 30.40 (5.54) –0.0001 (0.18)
b=9
1.661 0.0529 0.4994 (0.05) 0.43 (5.43) 0.0017 (0.15) 0.6501 0.7777 (0.04) 30.27 (5.52) –0.0004 (0.18)
b=18
1.684 0.0490 0.4999 (0.05) 0.11 (5.41) 0.0003 (0.15) 0.6570 0.7644 (0.04) 28.99 (5.54) –0.0011 (0.18)
b=36
1.665 0.0516 0.5000 (0.05) 0.10 (5.41) 0.0017 (0.15) 0.7779 0.5865 (0.05) 9.57 (5.64) 0.0003 (0.15)
TS
b=1
1.751 0.0496 0.4999 (0.11) –0.1108 (5.44) –0.0001 (0.17) 0.7425 0.6961 (0.11) 21.35 (6.14) 0.0302 (0.19)
b=2
1.739 0.0497 0.4997 (0.11) –0.0431 (5.41) –0.0016 (0.17) 0.7479 0.6934 (0.11) 21.27 (6.11) 0.0290 (0.19)
b=6
1.741 0.0513 0.4994 (0.11) 0.3098 (5.44) –0.0001 (0.17) 0.7489 0.6825 (0.10) 19.88 (6.14) 0.0257 (0.18)
b=9
1.729 0.0499 0.5000 (0.10) 0.1311 (5.42) 0.0001 (0.17) 0.7547 0.6747 (0.10) 18.95 (6.13) 0.0229 (0.18)
b=18
1.722 0.0494 0.5008 (0.10) 0.4446 (5.42) 0.0013 (0.16) 0.7602 0.6509 (0.10) 16.40 (6.11) 0.0184 (0.17)
b=36
1.697 0.0507 0.4999 (0.08) 0.4332 (5.41) 0.0013 (0.16) 0.7726 0.6040 (0.10) 11.45 (6.07) 0.0095 (0.16)
CGI
(c = 2) 1.887 0.0496 0.4871 (0.28) 0.19 (5.42) 0.0004 (0.24) 0.4298 0.8294 (0.11) 37.59 (6.19) 0.0340 (0.21)
MZR
nER=2
1.794 0.0516 0.5005 (0.19) 0.2794 (5.41) 0.0002 (0.19) 0.7471 0.6569 (0.12) 17.15 (5.76) 0.0229 (0.17)
nER=6
1.780 0.0507 0.4998 (0.17) 0.3487 (5.43) 0.0001 (0.18) 0.7632 0.6414 (0.10) 15.47 (5.49) 0.0202 (0.16)
nER=11
1.751 0.0508 0.5001 (0.14) –0.2534 (5.41) 0.0007 (0.17) 0.7755 0.6173 (0.08) 12.86 (5.29) 0.0155 (0.16)
Gwise
nER=2
1.877 0.0495 0.4997 (0.13) –0.08 (5.43) 0.0012 (0.18) 0.7193 0.4999 (0.13) –0.11 (6.47) –0.0013 (0.18)
nER=6
1.697 0.0482 0.5003 (0.06) –0.08 (5.45) –0.0000 (0.15) 0.7833 0.5005 (0.06) 0.02 (5.67) –0.0013 (0.15)
nER=11
1.705 0.0492 0.4999 (0.06) 0.07 (5.41) 0.0007 (0.15) 0.7837 0.5000 (0.06) –0.20 (5.66) 0.0000 (0.15)

Note: The true variance of the response is σk2=0.642 for k{0,1}.

Abbreviations: ER, Equal Randomization; ETO, Expected Total Outcome; FLGI, Forward‐Looking Gittins Index; MZR, Modified Zhang and Rosenberger; TS, Thompson Sampling; CGI, Constrained Gittins Index; FLGI‐HZ, Forward‐Looking Gittins Index Implemented Using Hu and Zhang.