Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 6;47(3):1305–1316. doi: 10.1002/mp.13971

Table 2.

Comparison of the different microbeam detection methods evaluated in this work.

  Microbeam detection method
vM1212 detector Zeiss Axio Imager 2 (+ EBT3 film) Epson Expression 10000XL (+ EBT3 film)
Advantages

Real time measurement and analysis

Short exposure is sufficient to obtain accurate profile information

Highest spatial resolution

No dose rate dependence49

Lower cost

Established clinical workflow

No dose rate dependence49

Disadvantages

Limited life expectancy due to cumulative radiation damage

Spatial resolution limited by 50 µm pixel pitch

24 hours self‐development

Complex and time consuming analysis process

24 hours self‐development

Poorest spatial resolution ad hence limited suitability for microbeam applications

  Higher price Necessity to establish procedures and workflow for wider uptake of this method Software licensing costs