Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 6;43(2):251–258. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12177

Table 3.

Comparison of possible risk factors between patients with low BMD (Z‐score <−2) and patients with BMD within normal range (Z‐score >−2)

Continuous data Low BMD Normal BMD P (Mann‐Whitney U test)
N Median N Median
Age most recent DXA (year) 10 27.5 171 28.0 .864
Recent BMI 10 21.7 167 24.9 .053
Mean Phe the year before the recent DXA (μmol/L) 10 800 156 775 .573
Categorical data Low BMD N (%) Normal BMD N (%) P (Fisher's Exact test)
Gender M 8 (80) 68 (40) .018 *
Sapropterin dichloride use yes 1 (11) 22 (14) >.99
Low vitamin D concentration yes 5 (50) 50 (31) .294
Vitamin D supplementation yes 3 (38) 39 (26) .434
Calcium supplementation yes 3 (38) 27 (18) .174
(ex) Smoker status yes 0 23 (23) .574
Alcohol consumption (on average >2 units/day) yes 2 (50) 25 (25) .272
Natural protein intake Missing or not adherent to a diet 3 (30) 27 (16) .588
Severe protein restriction (<10 g/day) 1 (10) 42 (25)
Moderate protein restriction (>10 to 20 g/day) 1 (10) 35 (21)
Mild protein restriction (>20 to 40 g/day) 2 (20) 28 (16)
protein intake > recommended intake (>40 g/day)a 3 (30) 39 (23)

Abbreviations: BMD, bone mineral density; BMI, body mass index; DXA, dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry.

a

An amount of >40 g was based on the safe amount of protein of 0.8 g/kg/day according to FAO/WHO/UNU with some patients weighing around 50 kg.

*

Not significant (P> .05) after post‐hoc adjustment of P value by Bonferroni method (multiplying P value by the number of tests (11)).