Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 21;97(3):268–278. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23904

Table 1.

Overview of the average reduction of all different methods, over all experiments and per individual experiment setup (V1,V2: volunteer used for training, stim,unstim: stimulation of samples used)

101 quantiles (0, 0.01, 0.02, …, 1) 2 quantiles (0.001, 0.999)
With clustering “CytoNorm” Without clustering With clustering Without clustering
Overall score 0.62 (±0.43) 0.21 (±1.62) 0.21 (±0.62) −0.12 (±0.74)
V1, unstim 0.65 (±0.34) 0.20 (±0.80) 0.26 (±0.46) −0.10 (±0.69)
V1, stim 0.58 (±0.48) 0.16 (±0.71) 0.21 (±0.58) −0.30 (±1.04)
V2, unstim 0.69 (±0.41) 0.36 (±0.66) 0.22 (±0.38) 0.05 (±0.47)
V2, stim 0.56 (±0.46) 0.13 (±2.94) 0.15 (±0.90) −0.09 (±0.57)