Table 4.
Number of cases showing qualitative contrast-enhancement feature during wash-out: cytophathology classification
| Enhancement degree | Homogeneity | Pattern | Margins | |||||||
| Isoenhancing | Hypoenhancing | Hyperenhancing | Homogeneous | Inhomogeneous | Centripetal | Centrifugal | Diffuse | Clear | Feathered | |
| Cytological diagnosis | ||||||||||
| BDA | 0 | 19 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 13 | 7 |
| BDC | 0 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 6 |
| HCC | 0 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| P value | 0.772 | 0.725 | 0.177 | 0.131 | ||||||
BDA, bile duct adenoma; BDC, bile duct carcinoma; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.