Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 17;18:24. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00579-y

Table 2.

Correlation analysis between pairs of target molecules during proliferative and secretory phases of endometrium

Pair proliferative phase secretory phase
r p-value r p-value r1 p1-value
VDR vs HOXA10 0.868 0.005 0.946 0.001 0.807 0.05
VDR vs CYP27B1 0.494 0.213 −0.764 0.046 −0.836 0.038
VDR vs CYP19 0.285 0.494 −0.266 0.564 −0.471 0.346
VDR vs 25(OH)D 0.529 0.177 0.491 0.263 0.744 0.09
HOXA10 vs CYP27B1 0.613 0.106 −0.571 0.18 −0.41 0.42
HOXA10 vs CYP19 0.269 0.52 −0.18 0.699 0.043 0.935
HOXA10 vs 25(OH)D 0.768 0.026 0.607 0.148 0.703 0.119
CYP27B1 vs CYP19 0.76 0.029 0.667 0.102 0.816 0.047
CYP27B1 vs 25(OH)D 0.403 0.322 −0.321 0.482 −0.556 0.252
CYP19 vs 25(OH)D 0.074 0.861 −0.487 0.268 −0.489 0.325

1r value and p value after adjusting for age that was associated with VDR and HOXA10 during secretory phase of endometrium