Brockington 1978.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling | Retrospective, unclear patient selection. | ||
Patient characteristics and setting |
N included in study: 134.
N in analysis: 134.
Age: Not reported.
Gender: Not reported.
Ethnicity: Not reported.
Comorbid disorders: Not reported.
Duration of symptoms: Not reported.
Concurrent medications used: Not reported. Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of functional psychosis (schizophrenia, affective psychosis, paranoid state, or other/unspecified psychosis). Exclusion criteria: Children under 15 years, geriatric patients over 65 years and people suffering from addictions, neuroses or situational disturbances. Study aim: Compare 10 definitions of schizophrenia in respect of their reliability, concordance and prediction of outcome with two different samples of patients. Previous treatment for schizophrenia: Not reported. Clinical setting: Inpatients. Country: UK. |
||
Index tests |
Description of FRS used: The symptoms of first rank importance are: Audible thoughts, voices heard arguing, voices commenting on one's actions; the experience of influences playing on the body (somatic passivity experiences), thought withdrawal and other interferences with thought; diffusion of thought, delusional perception and all feelings, impulses (drives) and volitional acts that are experienced by the patient as the work or influence of others". Professionals performing test: Psychiatrists. Resolution of discrepancies: "Disagreements were resolved and an agreed verdict reached, so that, for each definition, each patient had a diagnosis made (schizophrenia present or absent) by agreement between 2 raters". How FRS used in study: Diagnosis. |
||
Target condition and reference standard(s) |
Reference standard: Final diagnosis comprised of original history, mental state schedules and follow‐up data reviewed to give a 'final' or lifetime' diagnosis. Target condition(s): Schizophrenia and non‐schizophrenia. Professionals performing test: 2 Psychiatrists. Resolution of discrepancies: Two raters worked together to decide on final diagnosis. |
||
Flow and timing |
Study process: A sample of mixed first and subsequent admissions interviewed by the US/UK diagnostic team at that hospital and given a project diagnosis of some form of functional psychosis (schizophrenia, affective psychosis, paranoid state, or other/unspecified psychosis). The interviews, using the 7th edition of the Present State Examination, were carried out usually within 24 hours and always within 72 hours of admission. 12 diagnostic definitions* were applied by 2 raters working independently from observations made at a single mental state examination. Follow‐up interviews were done an average of 6.5 years after the index admission, and final diagnoses were made by 2 raters based on original history, mental state schedules and follow‐up data . Follow‐up: 6.5 years |
||
Comparative | |||
Notes | 2 samples were reported (Camberwell and Netherne), however we only refer to the Netherne sample since this is the only one to report the reference standard of 'final diagnosis'. | ||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | Unclear | ||
Was a case‐control design avoided? | Yes | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Yes | ||
Unclear | Low | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Yes | ||
Did the study pre‐specify whether they were using one or multiple FRSs? | No | ||
Unclear | Low | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | Yes | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | No | ||
Unclear | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | No | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive a reference standard? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive an index test? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive the same index test? | Yes | ||
Low |