Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 25;2015(1):CD010653. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010653.pub2

Daradkeh 1995.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Retrospective, selected from a previous sample.
Patient characteristics and setting N included in study: 168.
N in analysis: 168.
Age: Mean age onset 26.8 years (SD = 9.3)
Gender: M 108, F 60.
Ethnicity: Not reported.
Comorbid disorders: Not reported.
 Duration of symptoms: Not reported.
Concurrent medications used: Not reported.
Inclusion criteria: Patients with major mental illnesses.
Exclusion criteria: Not reported.
Study aim: Prevalence and diagnostic validity of FRS for schizophrenia..
Previous treatment for schizophrenia: Not reported.
Clinical setting: Unclear.
Country: United Arab Emirates.
Index tests Description of FRS used: FRS's assessed through OPCRIT.
Professionals performing test: Not reported.
Resolution of discrepancies: Not reported.
How FRS used in study: Prevalence and diagnosis.
Target condition and reference standard(s) Reference standard: ICD‐10 through OPCRIT.
Target condition(s): Schizophrenia.
Professionals performing test: Pair of clinicians.
Resolution of discrepancies: Not reported.
Flow and timing Study process:Patients selected from a larger previous trial of ICD‐10. Most patients assessed by pairs of clinicians and two thirds had diagnostic interviews applied. OPCRIT was used to generate diagnosis and FRSs.
Follow‐up: Not reported.
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? No    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Unclear    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
    Unclear Unclear
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear    
Did the study pre‐specify whether they were using one or multiple FRSs? No    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Unclear    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes    
Did all patients receive a reference standard? Yes    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Did all patients receive an index test? Yes    
Did all patients receive the same index test? Yes    
    Low