| Box 2: Recommendations for the equitable provision of OIT | Ethical imperative, data or other considerations in support of the recommendation |
|---|---|
| The notion of severity is inadequate for determining eligibility for OIT, as the risk of a reaction and of it being severe are difficult to predict and does not necessarily correlate with the psychosocial impact on patients and families. The aim should thus be to make OIT available as an option for all patients wishing to receive it, provided there is no contraindication and a clear understanding of individual risks and benefits |
This recommendation is based on the principle of equity in eligibility It is supported by data from consultations with stakeholders and key aspects emerging from the literature |
| A lack of public investment has resulted in a situation of low capacity and disparities in access to care for the accurate diagnosis and proper management of food allergy. This applies to management choices that include both avoidance and OIT |
This recommendation is based on the principles of solidarity and equity of access. This refers to both regional access and access to food allergy care in general It is supported by data from consultations with stakeholders and key aspects emerging from the literature |