Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 18;16:40. doi: 10.1186/s13007-020-00582-9

Table 7.

Outcome of the approach of spike counting on the test images of 30 plants

Image no Ground truth Predicted using model TP FP FN Precision Accuracy F1 score
1 10 9 9 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
2 8 7 7 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
3 10 9 8 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
4 11 10 10 0 1 1.00 0.91 0.95
5 10 10 10 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
6 9 9 8 1 0 0.89 0.89 0.94
7 10 9 9 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
8 6 6 6 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
9 12 11 10 0 1 1.00 0.91 0.95
10 12 12 11 0 1 1.00 0.92 0.96
11 13 12 10 0 1 1.00 0.91 0.95
12 11 10 9 0 1 1.00 0.90 0.95
13 6 6 6 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
14 8 8 8 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
15 16 15 13 2 1 0.87 0.81 0.90
16 2 2 2 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
17 10 10 10 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
18 1 1 1 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
19 11 10 10 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
20 7 7 7 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
21 8 7 7 0 1 1.00 0.88 0.93
22 8 7 7 0 1 1.00 0.88 0.93
23 10 10 10 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
24 11 10 10 0 1 1.00 0.91 0.95
25 2 2 2 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
26 8 8 7 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
27 9 8 7 0 1 1.00 0.88 0.93
28 12 10 10 0 2 1.00 0.83 0.91
29 7 7 7 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00
30 8 8 7 1 0 0.88 0.88 0.93
Average 0.99 0.95 0.97