Table 2.
Logistic regression analysesb of characteristics of women wanting to delay first childbirth ≥2 years
| Unadjusted Odd Ratios | Adjusted Odd Ratios | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | |
| Age group | ||||
| 20–24 (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| 15–19 | 1.60 | 1.49–1.73 | 1.04 | 0.66–1.65 |
| Place of residence | ||||
| Urban (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Rural | 1.01 | 0.92–1.10 | 1.08 | 0.78–1.51 |
| Religion | ||||
| Hindu (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Muslim | 0.65 | 0.57–0.73 | 0.71 | 0.45–1.12 |
| Other | 0.74 | 0.62–0.87 | 1.51 | 0.92–2.49 |
| Caste | ||||
| SC/ST (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| OBC | 1.08 | 0.99–1.17 | 1.55 | 1.14–2.10 |
| General | 1.28 | 1.16–1.41 | 1.15 | 0.77–1.73 |
| Education level | ||||
| No education (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Primary | 1.22 | 1.03–1.45 | 1.08 | 0.59–2.00 |
| Secondary | 1.92 | 1.70–2.17 | 1.46 | 0.91–2.36 |
| Higher | 2.62 | 2.27–3.02 | 2.04 | 1.11–3.76 |
| Wealth index | ||||
| Poorest (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Poorer | 1.12 | 1.00–1.25 | 1.09 | 0.71–1.67 |
| Middle | 1.16 | 1.03–1.30 | 1.00 | 0.64–1.56 |
| Richer | 1.16 | 1.03–1.31 | 1.22 | 0.74–2.02 |
| Richest | 1.35 | 1.19–1.52 | 1.46 | 0.85–2.51 |
| Media exposure to family planning | ||||
| No (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 1.20 | 1.11–1.30 | 0.90 | 0.66–1.21 |
| Age at marriage | ||||
| 0–17 (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| 18–24 | 0.98 | 0.90–1.06 | 1.57 | 1.10–2.24 |
| Husband’s education level | ||||
| No education (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Primary | 1.10 | 0.69–1.76 | 1.03 | 0.52–2.00 |
| Secondary | 1.71 | 1.19–2.45 | 1.36 | 0.77–2.39 |
| Higher | 2.71 | 1.84–3.99 | 2.42 | 1.27–4.64 |
| Age of husband | 0.91 | 0.88–0.93 | 0.75 | 0.66–0.84 |
| Age difference | 0.95 | 0.92–0.98 | 1.25 | 1.10–1.40 |
| Physical IPVa | ||||
| Yes (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 2.01 | 1.33–3.03 | 1.85 | 1.09–3.11 |
| Sexual IPVa | ||||
| Yes (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 1.77 | 0.90–3.47 | 1.25 | 0.58–2.69 |
| Emotional IPVa | ||||
| Yes (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 1.13 | 0.70–1.82 | 0.59 | 0.31–1.09 |
| Controlling behavioura | ||||
| Yes (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 1.06 | 0.83–1.35 | 0.96 | 0.74–1.25 |
aData on intimate partner violence (IPV) were only collected from 1651 women out of the total sample, thus our model only included data from these women
bUnadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with their 95%CIs adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, partner characteristics and exposure to intimate partner violence