TABLE 5.
Hierarchical multiple regression predicting distress.
| Predictor | β | SE | t | CI95% LL | CI95% UL | ΔR2 | ΔF |
| Step 1 | 0.06*** | 160.64*** | |||||
| C1 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 9.92∗∗∗ | 0.04 | 0.07 | ||
| C2 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 5.43∗∗∗ | 0.02 | 0.05 | ||
| C3 | −0.17 | 0.01 | −13.79*** | −0.17 | −0.13 | ||
| Step 2 | 0.05*** | 132.47*** | |||||
| C1 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 11.65*** | 0.05 | 0.08 | ||
| C2 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 7.71*** | 0.04 | 0.07 | ||
| C3 | −0.16 | 0.01 | −13.57*** | −0.16 | −0.12 | ||
| Emotional PS | −0.19 | 0.01 | −12.14*** | −0.18 | −0.13 | ||
| Informational PS | −0.05 | 0.01 | –2.90∗∗ | −0.06 | −0.01 | ||
| Financial PS | −0.01 | 0.01 | –0.85 | −0.04 | 0.01 | ||
| Step3 | 0.003* | 2.34* | |||||
| C1 | 0.34 | 0.03 | 6.29*** | 0.11 | 0.21 | ||
| C2 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 2.26∗ | 0.01 | 0.17 | ||
| C3 | −0.12 | 0.05 | –1.95 | −0.21 | 0.00 | ||
| Emotional PS | −0.19 | 0.01 | −11.52*** | −0.19 | −0.14 | ||
| Informational PS | −0.04 | 0.02 | −2.46∗ | −0.07 | −0.01 | ||
| Financial PS | −0.01 | 0.01 | –0.81 | −0.04 | 0.02 | ||
| C1 x Emotional PS | −0.08 | 0.01 | –1.32 | −0.03 | 0.01 | ||
| C1 x Informational PS | −0.08 | 0.01 | –1.15 | −0.03 | 0.01 | ||
| C1 x Financial PS | −0.06 | 0.01 | –0.99 | −0.02 | 0.01 | ||
| C2 x Emotional PS | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.20 | −0.02 | 0.02 | ||
| C2 x Informational PS | −0.06 | 0.01 | –0.96 | −0.04 | 0.01 | ||
| C2 x Financial PS | −0.02 | 0.01 | –0.28 | −0.03 | 0.02 | ||
| C3 x Emotional PS | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.83 | −0.02 | 0.05 | ||
| C3 x Informational PS | −0.09 | 0.02 | –1.52 | −0.06 | 0.01 | ||
| C3 x Financial PS | −0.01 | 0.02 | –0.15 | −0.04 | 0.03 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. C1 = United States vs. China, South Korea, Japan; C2 = China vs. South Korea, Japan; C3 = South Korea vs. Japan; PS = parental support.