Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 24;13(4):1011. doi: 10.3390/ma13041011

Table 7.

The main partition structure of a hemp–lime composite building.

No External Wall d
(m)
λ
(W/m∙K)
R
(m2K/W)
External partition
1 Clay 0.015 0.850 0.018
2 Concentrated hempcrete 0.400 0.046 8.696
3 Wattle mat 0.010 0.070 0.143
4 Clay 0.015 0.850 0.018
- Internal partition - - UC = 0.11 Wm2K
No Inside Ceiling d
(m)
λ
(W/m∙K)
R
(m2K/W)
Inside partition
1 Oak fibers lengthwise 0.030 0.400 0.075
2 Pine and spruce fibers crosswise 0.025 0.160 0.156
3 Concentrated hempcrete 0.200 0.046 4.348
4 Pine and spruce fibers crosswise 0.025 0.160 0.156
- Outside partition - - UC =  0.20 Wm2K
No Ground Floor d
(m)
λ
(W/m∙K)
R
(m2K/W)
Outside partition
1 Granulated blast furnace slag, Keramzyt 700 0.300 0.200 1.500
2 Concentrated hempcrete 0.150 0.046 3.261
3 Sand-lime plaster 0.080 0.800 0.100
4 Oak fibers lengthwise 0.025 0.400 0.063
Inside partition UC = 0.20 Wm2K
No Roof d
(m)
λ
(W/m∙K)
R
(m2K/W)
Outside partition
1 Wattle slabs 0.350 0.070 5.000
2 Pine and spruce fibers crosswise 0.025 0.160 0.156
3 Hempcrete 0.150 0.044 3.409
4 Pine and spruce fibers crosswise 0.025 0.160 0.156
5 Straw slabs 0.010 0.080 0.125
6 Clay 0.030 0.850 0.035
- Inside partition - - UC = 0.11 Wm2K