Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 11;11:402. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00402

TABLE 2.

Comparison of the growth rates of acetogens.

Strain Gas condition Growth rate References
Acetobacterium woodii 5% CO/16% CO2/64% H2 (100 kPa) 0.028 h–1 Bertsch and Müller, 2015
10% CO/16% CO2/64% H2 (100 kPa) ∼ 0.022 h–1
15% CO/16% CO2/64% H2 (100 kPa) ∼ 0.011 h–1
25% CO/15% CO2 (100 kPa) No growth
Butyribacterium methylotrophicum 100% CO (100 kPa) 0.050 h–1 Lynd et al., 1982
Clostridium autoethanogenum 45% CO/20% CO2/2% H2 (200 kPa)* 0.057 ± 0.04 h–1 Marcellin et al., 2016
100% CO (200 kPa) 0.019 h–1 Liew et al., 2016
Clostridium carboxidivorans 100% CO (120 kPa) 0.084 ± 0.004 h–1 Fernandez-Naveira et al., 2016
Clostridium ljungdahlii 80% CO/20% CO2 (200 kPa) 0.060 h–1 Phillips et al., 1994
Eubacterium limosum 44% CO/22% CO2/2% H2 (200 kPa)* 0.095 ± 0.000 h–1 This study
Moorella thermoacetica 30% CO/30% CO2 (240 kPa) 0.069 h–1 Daniel et al., 1990
Thermoanaerobacter kivui CO 20% (200 kPa) Makeup gas (80% N2/20% CO2) 0.037 h–1 Weghoff and Müller, 2016
CO 50% (200 kPa) Makeup gas (80% N2/20% CO2) 0.045 h–1
CO 70% (200 kPa) Makeup gas (80% N2/20% CO2) 0.068 h–1
CO 90% (200 kPa) Makeup gas (80% N2/20% CO2) 0.020 h–1
CO 100% (200 kPa) 0.021 h–1

*Industrial syngas composition.