Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD001290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001290.pub2

Ng 2006.

Methods STUDY DESIGN: Parallel group 
 LOCATION, NUMBER OF CENTRES: Single centre in Hong Kong. 
 DURATION OF STUDY: 3 months
Outcome assessors were blinded
Participants N SCREENED: Not clear 
 N RANDOMISED: 100 (treatment: 45; control: 55) 
 N COMPLETED: 100 
 M = 74 
 F = 26 
 MEAN AGE: 2 to 5 years: 68; 6 to 9 years: 24; 10 to 15 years: 8 
 BASELINE DETAILS: Mild and mild to moderate asthma 
 INCLUSION CRITERIA: 2 to 15 years; admitted with an acute asthmatic attack 
 EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Children with severe acute asthma requiring intensive care; non‐Chinese speakers
Interventions EDUCATION GROUP: 6 components: (i) contact with Asthma Nurse < 24 hours post‐admission; ii) booklet with same information & action plan with modified cartoon figures. Asthma diary given to parents (iii) video intervention; (iv) 30‐minute teaching & discussion session; v) assessment of inhaler technique & reinforcement of knowledge of asthma prior to discharge; (vi) telephone follow up 1 week after discharge
Setting: Hospital & home
CONTROL GROUP: 3 components (i) Asthma Nurse acted 1 to 2 days after admission; (ii) information sheet describing nature of asthma, avoidance of triggers, usage of medication, & steps to be take in acute asthmatic attack. Asthma diary given to parents; (iii) 30‐minute teaching & discussion session.
TREATMENT PERIOD: 1 to 2 days (in hospital) 
 FOLLOW‐UP PERIOD: 3 months
Outcomes ED visits; hospitalisation; compliance; school absence
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk Computer‐generated random‐number table
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Information not available
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Information not available