Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD001290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001290.pub2

Smith 2004.

Methods STUDY DESIGN: Parallel group randomised controlled trial 
 LOCATION, NUMBER OF CENTRES: Urban ED in USA 
 DURATION OF STUDY: 6 months
Outcome assessors were blinded
Participants N SCREENED: 702 
 N RANDOMISED: 543 (of which 527 enrolled) 
 N COMPLETED: 302 
 M = 349 
 F = 178 
 MEAN AGE: 6.4 years 
 BASELINE DETAILS: 92% African American; 92% Medicaid; 
 INCLUSION CRITERIA: 2 to 12 years; Medicaid or no medical insurance 
 EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Admission to hospital during index ED visit; chronic illness other than asthma; no working telephone in the home; participation in another asthma study; no primary care physician; parents unable to communicate effectively in English
Interventions EDUCATION GROUP: 2 follow‐up phone calls and monetary incentive delivered by health educator. Call on day 2 (2‐day call) and the other on day 5 (5‐day call) post‐index ED visit. Coach reinforced importance of PCP follow up and discussed advantages of seeking follow‐up care with child's PCP. Strategies to overcome barriers to follow‐up care mentioned by the parents also discussed.
Setting: Home
CONTROL GROUP: Usual care
TREATMENT PERIOD: 5 days 
 FOLLOW‐UP PERIOD: 6 months
Outcomes ED visit; scheduled attendance with primary care provider
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Information not available
Allocation concealment? Low risk Information not available
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk All participants analysed from audit checks