Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD001290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001290.pub2

Wesseldine 1999.

Methods STUDY DESIGN: Parallel design, controlled trial 
 LOCATION, NUMBER OF CENTRES ‐ Leicester UK, Children's hospital 
 DURATION OF STUDY:18 months
Outcome assessors blinded
Participants N SCREENED: Not reported 
 N RANDOMISED: 160 (treatment: 80; control: 80) 
 N COMPLETED: 160 
 M = 98 
 F = 62 
 MEAN AGE: Range: 2 to 16 years 
 BASELINE DETAILS: Previous ED visit: intervention 23%, control 19%; hospital admission in previous 6 months: intervention 20%, control 24% 
 INCLUSION CRITERIA: 2 to 16 years, admitted to a children's hospital for asthma during 1996 
 EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Not reported
Interventions EDUCATION GROUP: Type: structured discharge package by trained children's asthma nurse, consisting of information (written and interactive); instruction in self‐management; individual written action plan, which allowed medication to be adjusted according to symptoms and peak flow (for children over 7 to 8 years)
Children and families included; delivered at time of discharge
Setting: hospital
Duration: 20 minutes; actual mean (SD): 23 (2.9) minutes
CONTROL GROUP: Usual care
TREATMENT PERIOD: Delivered at discharge 
 FOLLOW‐UP PERIOD: 6 months
Outcomes Hospital admissions, ED visits, GP consultations for problematic asthma, and school days lost for any medical illness ‐ measured for 6 months after discharge, i.e. AFTER intervention completed 
 Nocturnal symptoms, activity restrictions also measured but data not given
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk Computer generated numerical codes in blocks of 10
Allocation concealment? Low risk Opaque, sealed envelopes, opened after consent obtained
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Complete set of data