Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ecol Modell. 2020 Jan 14;417:108919. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108919

Table 3.

Population parameters derived for Franklin County deer population from peer-reviewed literature, field-based surveys or expert opinions.

Parameter Description Value Reference
Population setup and distribution
post_harvest_density Initial deer density (per forested sq. mile) 23 MDC
sexratio Male: female ratio in the population 1:1.2 MDC
adultprop Adult proportion (≥25 months) in the population 0.4 MDC
yearlingprop Yearling proportion in the population 0.25 MDC
min-forestcover-percent Minimum percent forest cover of a patch for deer occupancy 0.25 (VerCauteren and Hygnstrom, 2004; Walter et al., 2010)
max-forestcover-percent Maximum percent forest cover of a patch for deer occupancy 0.75 (VerCauteren and Hygnstrom, 2004; Walter et al., 2010)
Behavior
mean-bachelor-group-size mean (± sd) number of adult bucks in a bachelor group 2 – 5 (Marchinton and Hirth, 1984; Smith, 1991; Miller et al., 2003), L.Hansen, pers.obs
doe-group-size-regulator doe social group size above which it undergoes fission 6 (Nelson and Mech, 1992; Miller et al., 2010), L.Hansen, pers.obs
juvenile-pregnancy-rate proportion of female fawns that reproduce 0.2 J. McRoberts, pers.comm.
adult-pregnancy-rate proportion of adult females that reproduce 0.8 MDC
yearling-male-dispersal-rate proportion of dispersing yearling males 0.46 (Diefenbach et al., 2008; Long et al., 2005)
yearling-female-dispersal-rate proportion of dispersing yearling females 0.22 (Nixon et al., 2007)
mean-female-dispersal-distance mean dispersal distance for yearling females (miles) 11 (Lutz et al., 2015)
stddev-dispersal-distance standard deviation for the mean dispersal distance of yearling females (miles) 4 (Lutz et al., 2015)