Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 24;69(4):271–285. doi: 10.1007/s00251-016-0966-2

Table 4.

Positive selection for bat TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 under site-specific models

Gene PSSa Site in alignmentb P (ω > 1) Domain
M2a M8
TLR7 238K 234 0.662 0.962* LRR7
282V 278 0.794 0.978* LRR8
303N c 299 0.949 0.994** LRR9
385Q 381 0.563 0.951* LRR12
387Y 383 0.799 0.978* LRR12
394N 390 0.620 0.957* LRR12
453A 449 0.710 0.966* LRR14
461Q 457 0.645 0.960* LRR14
493L 488 0.797 0.978* LRR14
737C 732 0.797 0.978* LRR24
TLR8 419K d 15 0.989* 0.996** LRR14
479T d 72 0.983* 0.994** LRR14
545S 137 0.899 0.962* LRR17
606V d 198 0.996** 0.998** LRR19
675R c 267 0.997** 0.999** LRR22
697Y d 289 0.984* 0.994** LRR23
721R 312 0.904 0.961* LRR24
TLR9 270R d 60 0.966** 0.992** LRR8
277R 67 0.871 0.961* LRR8
298H 88 0.894 0.971* LRR9
301I 91 0.862 0.958* LRR9
325T c 115 0.951* 0.987* LRR10
326R c 116 0.969* 0.992** LRR10
331K 121 0.915 0.977* LRR10
355S d 145 0.999** 1.000** LRR11
358P 148 0.898 0.971* LRR11
364H d 154 0.968* 0.992** LRR11
382D d 172 0.984* 0.997** LRR12
392E d 182 0.991** 0.998** LRR12
405Q c 195 0.973* 0.994** LRR13
407Q 197 0.913 0.977* LRR13
416R c 206 0.971* 0.993** LRR13
418C 208 0.866 0.960* LRR14
431P 220 0.866 0.960* LRR14
434R c 223 0.960* 0.990** LRR14
447G 236 0.838 0.950 LRR14
451S 240 0.934 0.983* LRR14
461A 250 0.928 0.981* LRR14
547Q 333 0.921 0.978* LRR17
602R d 388 0.973* 0.993** LRR20
651K c 437 0.956* 0.989* LRR21
658V d 444 0.976* 0.994** LRR22
727K d 513 0.972* 0.993** LRR24
735A 521 0.936 0.983* LRR25

*P (ω > 1) > 0.95; **P (ω > 1) > 0.99

aPositively selected sites detected by models M2a or M8 with P (ω > 1) ≥ 0.95 (scored by BEB). Sites both selected by models M2a and M8 are in bold. The amino acids refer to Rhinolophus affinis

bThe alignments of bat TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 can be found in the top of mlc files (result files from PAML)

cThe sites only selected in bats

dThe sites both selected in bats and mammals