Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ Rev. 2019 Dec;109(12):4178–4219. doi: 10.1257/aer.20180279

Table 3—

OLS and IV Estimates of Effect of PM 2.5 on Medicare Hospitalization Outcomes

FFS all-age mortality All inpatient spending Inpatient ER spending Inpatient admissions rate Inpatient ER admissions rate Inpatient + outpatient ER rate Non-ER admissions rate (placebo)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Panel A. OLS estimates
PM 2.5 (μg/m3) 0.130 −11,489 84 −0.717 0.091 0.329 −0.809
(0.023) (2,242) (972) (0.157) (0.081) (0.112) (0.124)
Dep. var. mean 402 37,984,768 16,805,670 3,366 1,749 3,984 1,617
Effect relative to mean, percent 0.032 −0.030 0.001 −0.021 0.005 0.008 −0.050
Observations 1,898,236 1,898,236 1,898,236 1,898,236 1,898,236 1,898,236 1,898,236
Adjusted R2 0.233 0.511 0.679 0.544 0.694 0.648 0.336
Panel B. IV estimates
PM 2.5 (μg/m3) 0.727 19,339 16,446 2.207 2.060 2.693 0.148
(0.071) (9,346) (4,266) (0.671) (0.317) (0.444) (0.441)
F-statistic 300 300 300 300 300 300 300
Dep. var. mean 402 37,984,768 16,805,670 3,366 1,749 3,984 1,617
Effect relative to mean, percent 0.181 0.051 0.098 0.066 0.118 0.068 0.009
Observations 1,898,236 1,898,236 1,898,236 1,898,236 1,898,236 1,898,236 1,898,236

Notes: Table reports OLS and IV estimates of equation (1) from the main text. All dependent variables are three-day measures per million fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries. All regressions include county, month-by-year, and state-by-month fixed effects; flexible controls for temperatures, precipitation, and wind speed; and two leads of these weather controls. OLS (IV) estimates also include two lags and two leads of PM 2.5 (instruments). Estimates are weighted by the number of FFS beneficiaries. Standard errors, clustered by county, are reported in parentheses.