Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ Rev. 2019 Dec;109(12):4178–4219. doi: 10.1257/aer.20180279

Table 6—

Best Linear Prediction of the Conditional Average Treatment Effect

Parameter (1) (2) (3) (4)
β1 (average treatment effect) 1.15 1.06 1.08 1.11
(0.221) (0.200) (0.263) (0.247)
β2 (heterogeneity) 0.0148 0.0133 0.0137 0.0126
(0.003) (0.00268) (0.00346) (0.00317)
Horvitz-Thompson transformation X X
Trimming threshold 5% 5% 1% 1%
Observations (millions) 21,724 21,724 23,075 23,075

Notes: Columns 1 and 3 present regression estimates of equation (5) from the main text. Columns 2 and 4 present estimates of equation (A6) from the online Appendix. The dependent variable is the one-day mortality rate per million beneficiaries. The parameter β1 measures the average mortality effect of being exposed to one day of air when the wind that day is blowing from a direction associated with high air pollution. Rejecting the null hypothesis that β2 = 0 implies that heterogeneity is present and that the proxy predictor, Ŝ(Zit), captures a component of this heterogeneity. These regressions omit observations with estimated propensity scores less than the trimming threshold or greater than 1 minus the threshold. Standard errors, clustered by county, are reported in parentheses.