Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 18;2020(3):CD004953. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004953.pub4

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Use of initial sustained inflation compared to standard inflations in newborns receiving resuscitation with no chest compressions for.

Use of initial sustained inflation compared to standard inflations in newborns receiving resuscitation with no chest compressions during resuscitation
Population: preterm infants resuscitated by PPV at birth
 Settings: delivery room in Europe (Austria, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands), Canada, Egypt, Thailand, USA, Australia, South Korea, and Singapore
 Intervention: use of initial sustained inflation in newborns receiving resuscitation with no chest compressions
 Comparison: standard inflations in newborns receiving resuscitation with no chest compressions
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No. of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Standard inflations in newborns receiving resuscitation with no chest compressions Use of initial sustained inflation
Deathin the delivery room Study population RR 2.66 
 (0.11 to 63.4) 479
 (5 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1,2  
0 per 1000 0 per 1000
 (0 to 0)
Medium risk population
0 per 1000 0 per 1000
 (0 to 0)
Deathbefore discharge Study population RR 1.09 
 (0.83 to 1.43) 1458
 (9 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
112 per 1000 122 per 1000
 (93 to 160)
Medium risk population
58 per 1000 63 per 1000
 (48 to 83)
Rate of mechanical ventilation Study population RR 0.89 
 (0.77 to 1.02) 910
 (4 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
   
461 per 1000 410 per 1000
 (355 to 470)
Medium risk population
439 per 1000 391 per 1000
 (338 to 448)
Chronic lung diseaseany grade Study population RR 0.98 
 (0.84 to 1.13) 1418
 (8 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
340 per 1000 333 per 1000
 (286 to 384)
Medium risk population
211 per 1000 207 per 1000
 (177 to 238)
Chronic lung diseasemoderate to severe BPD Study population RR 0.95 
 (0.74 to 1.22) 683
 (5 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1  
257 per 1000 244 per 1000
 (190 to 314)
Medium risk population
211 per 1000 200 per 1000
 (156 to 257)
Pneumothorax Study population RR 0.89 
 (0.57 to 1.39) 1458
 (9 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1,2  
52 per 1000 46 per 1000
 (30 to 72)
Medium risk population
50 per 1000 44 per 1000
 (28 to 69)
Cranial ultrasound abnormalitiesIntraventricular haemorrhage grade 3 to 4 Study population RR 0.85 
 (0.56 to 1.28) 735
 (6 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1,2  
116 per 1000 99 per 1000
 (65 to 148)
Medium risk population
54 per 1000 46 per 1000
 (30 to 69)
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 all studies at high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain (lack of blinding) and 1 study stopped early
 2 few events