Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 6;20(2):1–121.

Table 7:

Aortic Valve Hemodynamics

Author, Year N (TAVI/SAVR)a Mean Aortic Valve Area (SD), cm2 Mean Aortic Valve Gradient (SD), mm Hg
Reardon et al, 201719 Baseline Baseline
SURTAVI TAVI: 0.8 (0.2) TAVI: 47.2 (14.3)
Baseline SAVR: 0.8 (0.2) SAVR: 47.8 (13.8)
1,642 (856/786) Discharge Discharge
Discharge TAVI: 2.1 (0.6) TAVI: 8.9 (4.1)
1,560 (835/725) SAVR: 1.8 (0.6) SAVR: 12.4 (5.7)
1 year 1 year 1 year
1,090 (590/500) TAVI: 2.2 (0.6) TAVI: 8.3 (4.0)
2 years SAVR: 1.8 (0.6) SAVR: 11.7 (5.6)
537 (294/243) 2 years 2 years
TAVI: 2.2 (0.7) TAVI: 7.8 (3.4)
SAVR: 1.7 (0.5) SAVR: 11.8 (5.7)
Statistically significant difference between groups at all time points post-procedure Statistically significant difference between groups at all time points post-procedure
Leon et al, 201610 Baseline Baseline
PARTNER 2 TAVI: 0.7 (0.2) TAVI: 44.9 (13.4)
Baseline SAVR: 0.7 (0.2) SAVR: 44.6 (12.5)
2,032 (1,011/1,021) 30 days 30 days
30 days TAVI: 1.7 (0.5) TAVI: 9.7 (3.5)
1,678 (890/788) SAVR: 1.5 (0.4) SAVR: 10.9 (4.3)
1 year 1 year 1 year
1,384 (751/633) TAVI: 1.6 (0.4) TAVI: 10.7 (4.5)
2 years SAVR: 1.4 (0.4) SAVR: 11.5 (4.4)
1,162 (626/536) 2 years 2 years
TAVI: 1.5 (0.4) TAVI: 10.8 (4.6)
SAVR: 1.4 (0.4) SAVR: 11.7 (4.7)
Statistically significant difference between groups at all time points post-procedure Statistically significant difference between groups at all time points post-procedure

Abbreviations: SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement; SD, standard deviation; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

a

Aortic valve hemodynamics were evaluated in the implanted population.