Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Sep 19;119(2):457–478. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000263

Table 2.

Reliability of Study Variables

Number of items Coefficient omega
Variable (Indicator) Age 10 Age 12 Age 14 Age 16
Self-esteem
 SDQ 6 .80 .82 .83 .88
 RSE 10 .85 .90 .90
Warmth
 Child rates mother 18 .90 .94 .94 .95
 Child rates father 18 .93 .95 .95 .96
 Mother rates father 18 .93 .95 .95 .95
 Father rates mother 18 .91 .91 .93 .93
Hostility
 Child rates mother 17 .82 .86 .91 .90
 Child rates father 17 .84 .90 .91 .93
 Mother rates father 17 .87 .84 .87 .85
 Father rates mother 17 .86 .84 .80 .85
Monitoring
 Child rates mother 14 .89 .93 .94 .95
 Child rates father 14 .95 .96 .96 .97
 Mother rates mother 14 .87 .90 .92 .95
 Mother rates father 14 .94 .96 .96 .96
 Father rates father 14 .88 .91 .94 .94
 Father rates mother 14 .92 .92 .94 .95
Involvement in education
 Child rates mother 4 .70 .75 .79 .83
 Child rates father 4 .93a .87 .88 .88
 Mother rates mother 4 .73 .70 .74 .72
 Father rates father 4 .77 .77 .74 .76
Parental relationship
 Mother’s rating 5 .95 .95 .96 .95
 Father’s rating 5 .92 .96 .95 .95
Family values of mother 5 .85 .80 .86 .90
Family values of father 5 .87 .84 .84 .87
Depression of mother 10 .85 .83 .85 .83
Depression of father 10 .80 .79 .81 .78
Economic hardship
 Mother rates subscale A 2 .87 .86 .86 .89
 Mother rates subscale B 6 .94 .93 .94 .96
 Mother rates subscale C 9 .79 .74 .78 .78
 Father rates subscale A 2 .85 .83 .87 .87
 Father rates subscale B 6 .94 .95 .94 .95
 Father rates subscale C 9 .77 .79 .82 .82
Presence of father 1

Note. Dash indicates that variable was not assessed at a given wave (RSE) or that coefficient omega is not applicable for single item measures (presence of father). SDQ = Self-Description Questionnaire; RSE = Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale; Subscale A = Can’t Make Ends Meet; Subscale B = Unmet Material Needs; Subscale C = Financial Cutbacks.

a

In this case, the model for computing coefficient omega with the psych package in R did not converge. Therefore, omega was computed as described in Widaman et al. (2011).