Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;86(3):533–547. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14127

Table 3.

Real‐world studies summary: quantitative data from patients with atrial fibrillation

Authors/study (country) n DOACS TOTAL DABIGATRAN RIVAROXABAN APIXABAN
Adjusted Not adjusted Underdosed Appropriate Overdosed Underdosed Appropriate Overdosed Underdosed Appropriate Overdosed
Barra et al. 5 (USA) 205 94 (45.9%) 111 patients (54.1%) NA 19/59 (32.2% of dabigatran users) NA 48/122 (39.3% of rivaroxaban users) 72/122 (59.0% of rivaroxaban users) 2/122 (1.7% of rivaroxaban users) 21/24 (87.5% of apixaban users 3/24 (12.5% of apixaban users) NA
Andreu Cayuelas et al. 9 (Spain) 692 485 (70.1%) 207 (29.9%) NA 77% of dabigatran users NA NA 69% of rivaroxaban users NA NA 67% of apixaban users NA
Yao et al. 11 (USA) 14 865 12 487 (84%) 2378 (16%): 12%underdosed; 4% overdosed 414/4653 (8.9% of patients without RIn) Total of 3 DOACs combined: 84% 28/71 (39.4% of those with RIn) 815/5399 (15.1% of patients without RIn) Total of 3 DOACs combined: 84% 425/1029 (41.3% of those with RIn) 551/3340 (16.5% of patients without RIn) Total of 3 DOACs combined: 84% 181/373 (48.5% of those with RIn)
Shin et al. 28 (USA) 3206 1811 patients (57%) 1367 patients (43%): 28% overdosed; 15% underdosed 107/890 (12% of dabigatran users) 83% (reduced dose) and 88% (full dose) 17% (among those who needed dose reduction) 155/1546 (10% of rivaroxaban users) 65% (reduced dose) and 90% (full dose) 35% (among those who needed dose reduction) 235/1307 (18% of apixaban users) 85% (reduced dose) and 82% (full dose) 15% (among those who needed reduced dose)
Carlin et al. 44 (Canada) 47 22 (46.8%) 25 (53.2%) NA NA NA NA NA NA 19/25 (76.0% of patients that are not adjusted) 22/47 (46.8%) 6/25 (24.0%)
Bando et al. 47 /SRRT (Japan) 1339 (453 elderly) 333/453 (73.5% of elderly group) 120/453 (26.5% of elderly group) NA NA NA 93/453 (20.5%)a 333/453 (73.5%)a 19/453 (4.0%)a NA NA NA
Pattullo et al. 48 (Australia) 131 78 (59.5%) 53 (40.5%): 13 overdosed (9.9%); 19 underdosed (14.5%); 21 CIn (16.1%) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Camm et al. 49 /XANTUS (Europe, Israel and Canada) 6784 3650 (53.8%) NA NA NA NA 592/6784 (8.7%) 3650/6784 (53.8%) 230/640 (36.0% of patients with RIn) NA NA NA
Brun Guinda et al. 50 (Spain) 137 94 (68.6%) 43 (31.4%) NA NA NA 43/112 (38.4% of patients without RIn) 94/137 (68.6%) 0 NA NA NA
Pharithi et al. 51 (Ireland) 301 154 (51.2%) 147 (48.8%): 65 underdosed (21.6%); 5 overdosed (1.7%); 36 CIn (11.9%)b 24/106 (22.7% of dabigatran users)c 45/106 (42.5% of dabigatran users) 21/106 (19.8% of dabigatran users): 20 CIn (18.9%); 1 overdosed (< 1.0%) 24/154 (15.6% of rivaroxaban users)d 87/154 (56.5% of rivaroxaban users) 20/155 (13.0% of rivaroxaban users): 16 CIn (10.4%); 4 overdosed (2.6%) 9/41 (22.0% of apixaban users) 30/41 (73.2% of apixaban users) 0/41 (0% of apixaban users)e
EDOXABAN
Authors n Underdosed Appropriate Overdosed
Okumura et al. 25 /SAKURA AF (Japan) 1689 9/30 (30.0% of edodoxaban users 19/30 (63.3% of edoxaban users) 2 patients (6.7% of edoxaban users)
a

ClCr was unknown in 8 patients (from the 453) so the dose adjustment was not evaluated.

b

Also in 10 patients (3.3%) was founded inappropriate frequency and in 31 (10.3%) possible drug interactions that can lead to not adjusted doses.

c

Also 8 patients (7.5%) had inappropriate frequency and 8 (7.5%) had possible drug interactions that can result in a not adjusted dose.

d

In 2 patients (1.3%), there was an inappropriate frequency and in 21 (13.6%) possible drug interactions that can be considered nonadjustment.

e

Also 2 patients (4.8%) were taking drugs that can affect DOACs action and consequently the appropriateness of dose adjustment.

AF = atrial fibrillation; CIn = contraindicated; CrCI = creatinine clearance; DOACs = direct oral anticoagulants; NA = nonavailable data; RIn = renal indication for dose reduction.