Table 4.
Comparison of the patients below (n = 12) the individual age, sex, height and weight-predicted values, with the remaining patients
| 6MWT (m) | Age | POMA (points) | TUG (s) | HGST (kg) | HADS (points) | FES (points) | MET-min/week | QOL (points) | Pain (points) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients below their reference values (n =12) | ||||||||||
| Mean | 419.8 | 65.8 | 19.0 | 12.2 | 29.8 | 11.4 | 25.6 | 2902.7 | 57.6 | 37.5 |
| SD | 123.9 | 12.1 | 4.8 | 4.1 | 10.3 | 4.9 | 8.4 | 2513.1 | 25.5 | 29.4 |
| Median | 426.0 | 65.0 | 19.5 | 11.5 | 31 | 13.0 | 22.5 | 1413.0 | 58.3 | 33.3 |
| Remaining patients (n =28) | ||||||||||
| Mean | 602.8 | 62.9 | 25.4 | 8.3 | 34.1 | 10.1 | 19.3 | 2791.4 | 61.0 | 36.3 |
| SD | 83.2 | 7.3 | 3.4 | 1.5 | 9.7 | 5.1 | 3.3 | 3336.9 | 20.0 | 31.4 |
| Median | 601.0 | 62.5 | 27.0 | 8.2 | 34.0 | 10.0 | 18.0 | 1653.0 | 66.7 | 33.3 |
SD standard deviation, m male, f female, 6MWT 6-min walk test, POMA Tinetti performance oriented mobility assessment, TUG timed up and go test, HGST handgrip strength test of the dominant hand, HADS hospital anxiety and depression scale, FES falls efficacy scale, MET metabolic equivalent of task, QOL quality of life