Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 18;11:1426. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15214-y

Table 1.

Data collection and processing.

Extended (Fe2+–NAD+–CoA) Compact (Fe2+–NADH)
Data collection
Microscope–camera Talos Arctica–K2 summit Talos Arctica–K2 summit
Voltage (kV) 200 200
Magnification 36,000 36,000
Electron exposure (e per Å2) 0.77 0.77
Pixel size (Å) 1.13 1.13
Decofus range (um) 0.4 – 2.4 0.4 – 2.4
Processing Helical reconstruction Single-particle analysis Helical reconstruction Single-particle analysis
Symmetry imposed

C1

Rise 56.5 Å,

Twist 164.4°

C1

C2

C1

Rise 34.7 Å,

Twist 154.5°

C1
Initial particle images (no.) 821,557 1,236,367 227,537 599,988
Final particle images (no.) 203,288 138,927 98,677 226,646
Map resolution (Å)–(FSC threshold model) 3.8–(0.143) 3.4–(0.143) 5–(0.143) 3.9–(0.143)
Refinement and validation
Map sharpening (B-factor) (Å−2) 121.41 82.58 246.65 206.89
Model composition
No. of chains 6 6
Atoms (no.) 39,781 39,760
Residues (no.) 2576 2578
Ligands (no.) Fe2+ (2)–NAD+ (4) Fe2+ (2)–NADH (2)
Bond lengths (Å) 0.011 0.006
Bond angles (°) 0.989 1.587
Ramachandran favored % 87.46 85.02
Ramachandran allowed % 12.54 14.05
Ramachandran outliers % 0.00 0.93
Rotamers outliers % 1.45 3.67
MolProbity score 2.11 2.59
Clashscore 6.89 9.43
CC (mask) 0.82 0.78
CC (box) 0.83 0.77
CC (peaks) 0.73 0.60
CC (volume) 0.82 0.79
Mean CC for ligands 0.76 0.71