Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 25;35(3):865–873. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05477-7

Table 2.

Methods for Correction of the QT Interval

Formula Equation Strengths Limitations When to use
Bazett QTc=QTRR

• Simplest formula

• Widely accepted and used

• Tendency to over-diagnose long QT as it overcorrects at high heart rates and undercorrects at low heart rates • Best used when HR is between 50 and 70 bpm55
Fridericia QTc=QTRR3 • More accurate than Bazett formula at abnormal heart rates • Tendency to overcorrect at high heart rates (i.e. over-diagnosis of long QT) • Useful in bradycardic patients (HR < 50 bpm)
Framingham QTc = QT + 0.154 (1 − RR) • Less affected by abnormal heart rate • Complex formula • In any patient, especially if heart rate is < 50 bpm or > 70 bpm
Hodges QTc=QT+1051RR1 • Least affected by abnormal heart rate56 • Complex formula • In any patient, especially if heart rate is < 50 bpm or > 70 bpm
Nomogram Not applicable (see Fig. 3) • Designed for use with abnormal heart rates

• Needs to be physically or digitally available at point of care

• Difficult to apply to serial testing

• Patients with abnormal heart rates

• Well described in toxicology and overdose

The “Half R-R” method If QT is less than half the RR interval, it is normal • No calculation required

• Non-quantitative

• If the QT is greater than half the RR interval, it may still be normal

• Cannot be used at HR < 60 bpm

• Useful as a “screening” test, especially in AF but not as a true diagnostic test.

RR, the R-R interval, measured in seconds; HR, heart rate; AF, atrial fibrillation